
FDA regulations governing specified electronic records and signatures, assessed with the underlying recordkeeping requirements.
21 CFR Part 11 is the US Food and Drug Administration’s regulation on specified electronic records and electronic signatures. It sets criteria for their trustworthiness, reliability and use in place of certain paper records and handwritten signatures.
Scope depends on the underlying predicate rules: the FDA requirements that require records to be kept or submitted. Part 11 can apply to records maintained electronically in place of required paper records and relevant electronic submissions. It does not apply to every document merely because a healthcare or life-sciences organization uses it.
The FDA’s scope-and-application guidance explains its interpretation and enforcement approach. That guidance does not erase the underlying predicate-rule duties, and a general electronic-signature law does not replace FDA-specific requirements.
The current regulation includes system and procedural requirements, with controls concerning:
Signature manifestations include the signer’s name, signing date and time, and the meaning of the signature, such as approval or responsibility. The required implementation must be assessed for the actual records and intended use; a visible mark or completion report alone does not establish compliance.
A closed system is one where access is controlled by those responsible for the record content. An open system lacks that control and has additional requirements appropriate to its risks. “Closed” does not simply mean offline, and a cloud service is not automatically an open system.
HIPAA concerns covered health-information responsibilities, while the ESIGN Act addresses electronic records and signatures in covered transactions. Neither substitutes for an applicable FDA requirement. The organization must establish scope, controls and retained evidence; a generic vendor badge is not an FDA determination that its whole process complies.
A Common Case: Determining a regulated record’s scope
Consider a Massachusetts medical-device consultancy preparing a client’s controlled approval record. Before choosing electronic signing, the team would identify the applicable FDA record requirement and assess the intended process, keeping ordinary administrative agreements separate from records actually within Part 11’s scope.
No. Applicability depends on the FDA record or submission requirements and the actual use of electronic records, not simply the organization’s industry.
No. The applicable system, people, procedures, record controls and signature requirements must be assessed together.
No. The definition turns on who controls access relative to responsibility for the record content, not merely where the system is hosted.